Set Evaluation Criteria
- Confirm the goals set for the evaluation period
- List the core competencies the role requires
- Define role-specific skills and behaviors to assess
- Align criteria with company values and standards
- Choose a clear, consistent rating scaleDefine what each rating level actually means.
- Use the same criteria across comparable roles
Gather Performance Evidence
- Collect data on results against each goal
- Pull metrics, outputs, and project outcomes
- Gather peer or stakeholder input where used
- Review the employee's self-assessment
- Note specific examples for strengths and gaps
- Cover the whole period, not just recent eventsAvoid recency bias by reviewing the full cycle.
Assess Goal Achievement
- Compare results to each agreed goal
- Judge whether goals were met, exceeded, or missed
- Account for context that affected outcomes
- Distinguish effort from measurable results
- Identify goals that need to roll into the next cycle
- Record evidence supporting each judgmentTie every conclusion to specific facts.
Rate Competencies
- Rate each competency against the defined scale
- Support every rating with a concrete example
- Assess behaviors aligned to company values
- Note clear strengths to build on
- Identify development areas with specifics
- Check ratings for consistency and fairnessCalibrate with peers to keep standards aligned.
Document the Evaluation
- Write clear, specific, evidence-based comments
- Summarize overall performance and key themes
- Record final ratings against each criterion
- Keep language objective and professional
- Note development goals and recommended actions
- Store the completed evaluation per your HR processRetention rules vary; follow local laws and HR guidance.
Prepare to Share Results
- Review the evaluation for accuracy and balance
- Have ratings calibrated or approved as required
- Outline the key points to discuss with the employee
- Prepare to explain the evidence behind each rating
- Plan development actions to propose
- Hand the documented evaluation to the review conversationThe evaluation feeds the review meeting.
0 / 36 done





